<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Spontaneous Monotony</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidarussell.co.uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidarussell.co.uk</link>
	<description>Blog about news, politics, computers and the internet by David Russell</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 19:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>BBC iPlayer - all that DRM and it can&#8217;t even count</title>
		<link>http://www.davidarussell.co.uk/2008/05/13/bbc-iplayer-all-that-drm-and-it-cant-even-count/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davidarussell.co.uk/2008/05/13/bbc-iplayer-all-that-drm-and-it-cant-even-count/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 19:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Russell</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Computers and Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidarussell.co.uk/?p=587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given the mood I&#8217;m in at the moment I don&#8217;t have any problem with picking on the BBC for this. The iPlayer displays &#8220;100% complete&#8221; when more than 99% of the file is downloaded - it can&#8217;t either display &#8220;99% complete&#8221;, or &#8220;99.3%&#8221;. Hey, to be fair, we can&#8217;t expect computers to like, determine the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the mood I&#8217;m in at the moment I don&#8217;t have any problem with picking on the BBC for this. The iPlayer displays &#8220;100% complete&#8221; when more than 99% of the file is downloaded - it can&#8217;t either display &#8220;99% complete&#8221;, or &#8220;99.3%&#8221;. Hey, to be fair, we can&#8217;t expect computers to like, determine the answer to a calculation accurately, it&#8217;s only 1978.. oh hang on.<br />
<img src="http://i204.photobucket.com/albums/bb159/Carzor_Stelatis/Blog%20article%20pictures/iplayer_strange.jpg" /><br />
However, I think something has gone wrong in the iPlayer, because my own single line Python program assures me that 328Mb != 330Mb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davidarussell.co.uk/2008/05/13/bbc-iplayer-all-that-drm-and-it-cant-even-count/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Final Fantasy re-releases</title>
		<link>http://www.davidarussell.co.uk/2008/05/09/final-fantasy-re-releases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davidarussell.co.uk/2008/05/09/final-fantasy-re-releases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 16:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Russell</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Final Fantasy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PSP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidarussell.co.uk/?p=584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been renewed discussion recently about the remake of FFVII for the PS3. Whatever the pros and cons of that potential bombshell (personally I&#8217;d prefer a remake of VIII or IX, but that&#8217;s just me), there is a way that Sony could instantly (or at least fairly quickly) sate our FF appetites while making [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been renewed discussion recently about the remake of FFVII for the PS3. Whatever the pros and cons of that potential bombshell (personally I&#8217;d prefer a remake of VIII or IX, but that&#8217;s just me), there is a way that Sony could instantly (or at least fairly quickly) sate our FF appetites while making a fair amount of money into the bargain. Why not re-release the PS1-era FInal Fantasy games as PSP Store downloads?</p>
<p>Think about it - 4 CDs&#8217; worth of game takes up a maximum of 2.6Gb of space (bump that to 2.8Gb if we&#8217;re talking 700mb expanded CDs, I never checked). Large-capacity Memory Sticks are relatively cheap (though <a href="http://www.play.com/Electronics/Electronics/4-/3511925/Play-com-8GB-SD-HC-Memory-Card/Product.html">nowhere near as cheap as SD cards</a> - boo hiss to Sony storage formats).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m having great fun playing Theme Hospital on my PSP. Being able to play the &#8216;golden age&#8217; Final Fantasy games on the go (and, perhaps more importantly, with the PSP&#8217;s sleep system to avoid savepoint woes), would be absolutely ace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davidarussell.co.uk/2008/05/09/final-fantasy-re-releases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Way</title>
		<link>http://www.davidarussell.co.uk/2008/05/09/no-way/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davidarussell.co.uk/2008/05/09/no-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 10:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Russell</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorised]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Neo Labour]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SNP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidarussell.co.uk/?p=586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The English Skills secretary John Denham has claimed that voters are deserting Neo Labour in their droves (current poll rating is 23% - the worst EVER and 26% behind the Tories) because people are &#8220;confused about what [Labour] stand for&#8221;. In fact the problem voters have is that Labour doesn&#8217;t stand for ANYTHING any more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The English Skills secretary John Denham has claimed that voters are deserting Neo Labour in their droves (<a href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article1142543.ece">current poll rating is 23%</a> - the worst EVER and 26% behind the Tories) because people are &#8220;<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7391549.stm">confused about what [Labour] stand for&#8221;</a>. In fact the problem voters have is that Labour doesn&#8217;t stand for ANYTHING any more - the Third Way has become an unprincipled stumble into whatever the spin doctors think will get Neo Labour good headlines in the Daily Mail. Most of the &#8216;big promises&#8217; that people bought into in 1997 have vanished:</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;tackle the division and inequality in our society&#8221;. I think the 10p tax mess shows that Neo Labour doesn&#8217;t give a damn about poverty any more. If the Tories had suggested a slight tax cut for the moderately well off, financed by DOUBLING the tax rate paid by the poorest in society, there would have been uproar.</li>
<li>&#8220;Real rights for citizens&#8221;. Yes, Labour passed the Human Rights Act which is a hugely important piece of legislation. Since 2001, however, it has set about trying to violate the human rights of people in this country in a systematic manner. 4 million CCTV cameras (which even the Labour-loving Metropolitan Police says don&#8217;t cut crime), police allowed to run amok shooting unarmed civilians, internment of people against whom there isn&#8217;t even enough evidence for a charge let alone a conviction. I could go on but I&#8217;m straining the limits of what you can legitimately put in one bullet point.</li>
<li>&#8220;Ethical foreign policy&#8221;. Yeah - Iraq, Afghanistan, extraordinary rendition. They haven&#8217;t so much ripped up this promise as put it through an industrial-grade crosscut shredder.</li>
<li>&#8220;We will not introduce &#8216;top-up&#8217; fees and have legislated to prevent them&#8221;. We all know how that one ended. I&#8217;m just glad we now have a Scottish Parliament (one of the few Labour achievements they haven&#8217;t managed to undermine yet, though Gordon&#8217;s doing his best now that us North Britishers have voted for the Wrong Party) and that Neo Labour are no longer in charge of education in this country. Ask someone in 1945, or even in the days of John Smith, whether the Labour Party would ever stop believing in free education and they&#8217;d have thought you&#8217;d lost it.</li>
</ul>
<p>Essentially Neo Labour has become a second Tory Party. Given the choice, people would opt for a party which is honest about its right-wing policies over one which lies and spins at every turn, trying to deceive the public. That&#8217;s why fewer than a quarter of people in the UK now identify themselves with the Labour Party, and why a mediocre Tory leader is looking more like winning the next UK election.</p>
<p>Still, I suppose there&#8217;s a bright side to this from a nationalist point of view: the SNP&#8217;s proposed independence referendum in 2010 would almost certainly be after the next UK election. Every time a Tory government is in power in London, support for independence in Scotland goes up, for <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/politics97/news/05/0501/scotland.shtml">fairly obvious reasons</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davidarussell.co.uk/2008/05/09/no-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympic shame</title>
		<link>http://www.davidarussell.co.uk/2008/04/07/olympic-shame/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davidarussell.co.uk/2008/04/07/olympic-shame/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 08:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Russell</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorised]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidarussell.co.uk/?p=585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday saw the Chinese propaganda parade through London, escorted by police who behaved rather more violently than was necessary. There was the predictable parade of apologist politicians going on about &#8220;the Olympic spirit&#8221; - what they seem to forget is that the Olympic flame is not a politically neutral sporting symbol. In fact it was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday saw the Chinese propaganda parade through London, escorted by police who behaved rather more violently than was necessary. There was the predictable parade of apologist politicians going on about &#8220;the Olympic spirit&#8221; - what they seem to forget is that the Olympic flame <strong>is not</strong> a politically neutral sporting symbol. In fact it was conceived by another dictatorial regime as a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/14/sports/olympics/14torch.html?ex=1207713600&amp;en=0bd71bac72af29b8&amp;ei=5070"><em>propaganda exercise</em></a> in the runup to the 1936 Olympics.</p>
<p>If there are still those - perhaps among those who took part - who want to argue that participating in a Chinese propaganda exercise does not constitute endorsement of the Chinese regime, then that&#8217;s up to them. They wouldn&#8217;t have the right to form their own opinion in their beloved China.</p>
<p>For the rest of us, the simple solution is to ignore the 2008 Olympics from now on. Don&#8217;t watch any of the TV coverage, or buy any of the merchandise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davidarussell.co.uk/2008/04/07/olympic-shame/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battlefield: Bad Company beta signups open (X360)</title>
		<link>http://www.davidarussell.co.uk/2008/03/20/battlefield-bad-company-beta-signups-open-x360/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davidarussell.co.uk/2008/03/20/battlefield-bad-company-beta-signups-open-x360/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Russell</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Computers and Internet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Battlefield]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Battlefield Bad Company]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Gamespy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Xbox 360]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidarussell.co.uk/?p=582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just got an email in from Gamespy offering places in the Xbox 360 beta of Battlefield: Bad Company. It&#8217;s only open to people who have a Gamespy Founders Club or IGN Insider subscription (there were public keys, but those have been given out already), those  who meet that requirement (and have an Xbox Live [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got an email in from Gamespy offering places in the <a title="European signup page for BF Bad Company beta" href="http://www.fileplanet.com/promotions/bfbc/eu/">Xbox 360 beta of Battlefield: Bad Company</a>. It&#8217;s only open to people who have a Gamespy Founders Club or IGN Insider subscription (there were public keys, but those have been given out already), those  who meet that requirement (and have an Xbox Live Gold account obviously) can follow the link for a beta 360 experience. Unlike the Call of Duty 4 beta, there&#8217;s no waiting time (the CoD4 one was a good idea, but the errors that led to people not being sent keys turned into a fiasco) - as soon as you fill out the form, you get your key onscreen.</p>
<p>The beta itself starts on the 25th of March - there&#8217;s no indication as to whether this means the usual Xbox Live launch time of 9am, or 12:01 GMT, or 12:01 Pacific Time, or whatever.</p>
<p>PS: Sorry for the atrocious pun,  couldn&#8217;t resist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davidarussell.co.uk/2008/03/20/battlefield-bad-company-beta-signups-open-x360/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
